Every time you say “both parties are the same” or merely “both parties are equally bad,” I will answer: Those of you who COULD HAVE voted for Democrats, and failed to do so, are just as bad as those who actively vote for Republicans.
Practical effect on the real world is about the same.
But, Bern-outs and other leftier-than-thou pure-gressives? If you must INSIST that the only solution is to let the party of voter suppression keep on making everything shittier until we have no choice but to rise up and smash the system…
…what makes you think your sorry asses won’t be first against the wall?
You want that revolution? Oh, trust me, cupcakes, you’ll get it.
Hot Take #1: The Electoral College is still evil even if we buy into the idea that it was designed to give the less-populous states better representation in government. Honestly, IDGAF if the rural folk get outvoted by the metro folk. Lots of populations are vulnerable to the tyranny of the majority. Sexual minorities get outvoted. Religious minorities get outvoted. Scientists are only a tiny percentage of the population, and we’d generally be better off if we got the policies they recommended, but the system isn’t built around multiplying their votes. If the less-populous states don’t get to have presidential candidates prioritize them as much as they would like, that’s not our problem.
Hot Take #2: Families who are adopting migrant children are basically participating in genocide. If you’ve recently adopted or are in the process of adopting a kid who may or may not have been gathered from an immigration detention facility, it’s your responsibility to find out where the kid came from. If it turns out the kid was taken away from their parents at the border, you should make every effort to find the parents and when the parents are found, return the kid to the family. Until the parents are found, love and care for that kid as best you can. That’s a way to do good in the world.
Hot Take #3: Also I honestly DGAF if most of the current crop of Democrats are at the beck and call of Wall Street. I mean, I GAF to the extent that we don’t want our elected officials to be building their policies around enabling money-hoarding, but that’s no reason to give up on voting. (Also, for the purposes of the current situation, voting for third-party candidates is effectively the same thing as not voting.) There’s no route to getting the money-hoarders’ grubby mitts off our elected officials that doesn’t go through voting blue. I’m not saying the Democrats are perfect, I’m saying they’re the ones who actually want to govern and they’re the ones who benefit from ending voter suppression.
Hot Take #4: Bern-outs can take a fucking seat for all eternity. Still bleating “Bernie would’ve won” and acting like the DNC fucked everything up by not handing the nomination to Sanders on a silver platter? What’s more likely: that the DNC actively sold the nomination to the less-effective candidate, or that more primary voters liked Hillary than Bernie? Bern-outs ain’t the political majority they think they deserve, and they can fucking own that, or they can fucking move to Russia. The troll-runners who hacked our election will be so happy to see them.
About that oft-cited statistic in progressive discourse that “53% of white women voted for Trump”? I don’t like it. 53% of white women did not vote for Trump. 53% of white women, of those who bothered to show up to the polls, voted for Trump.
It’s not that I object to calling out white women for letting Trumpty Numpty squat in the White House. Of course we should be called out. My objection is that the 53% statistic is burying the lede. I have a very, very hard time believing that any non-trivial number of American white women voted for Obama in 2012 and then voted for Trump in 2016. The problem is more in those who didn’t vote at all in 2016.
(For the purposes of this argument, voting for third-party candidates is the same thing as not voting at all. If you could’ve voted for Hillary, and didn’t, you’re part of the problem.)
The rhetorical distinction matters because there are so fucking many progressive Americans who go around thinking inaction equals blamelessness. So they hear the “53% of white women voted for Trump” line and they think it isn’t about them because they voted for no one. Bullshit. The problem is in the number of progressive Americans who were eligible to vote in 2016 and did not vote for Hillary. Whether they voted for Jill Stein or Gary Johnson or wrote in the name of whatever inconsequential no-name putz Susan Sarandon told them to, or just stayed home and didn’t vote at all, that’s the number we should be talking about.
I am so LOL-ing at the memory of hearing from those Bern-outs right after the 2016 election who were so happy to believe the DNC had unfairly rigged the primaries in Hillary’s favor, but actively sneered at the idea that the Russian government had meddled in the general election. Oh, no, we needed to focus on the REAL problem, which is that Bernie would’ve won.
Yeah, of course, so many progressive Americans found it so much easier to believe the DNC had sabotaged itself (nah) by unfairly stacking the deck (nope) in favor of the weaker candidate (uh-uh), than that a hostile foreign power had fucked with our election to favor the Kremlin-approved candidate.
Of course, part of the Kremlin’s propaganda used to fuck with our election was convincing a lot of progressive Americans that Hillary had scored the nomination illegitimately.
Which means, not only were the Bern-outs wrong in where the actual sabotage was, they were, in fact, a symptom of the sabotage. All’a y’all acting like Hillary got the nomination by some means other than getting more Democratic primary voters on her side? Congratulations, you’ve bought into Russian propaganda. And the sooner y’all admit you’ve been had, the sooner we can clean up this mess.