It was his right to die.

I’m sure you heard this week that Ariel Castro, the kidnapper, rapist and torturer of Amanda Berry, Michelle Knight and Gina DeJesus, was found dead in his cell after an apparent suicide.

First off: I called it.

Now that it’s happened, I stand by what I said earlier. The justice system is not obligated to protect prisoners from themselves. And with that in mind, I think Castro’s suicide was the best thing that could have happened.

It has been widely argued that his killing himself was the final act of a massive control freak. Maybe so, but I don’t see anything wrong with that. He was long past any chance of making a positive contribution to society, he’d forfeited his freedom, and the rest of his natural life would’ve been nothing but decades of wasted food and oxygen. Now that he’s dead, the guards don’t have to deal with him, the other inmates don’t have to deal with him, and the state doesn’t have to provide for him.

I don’t know how Amanda, Michelle and Gina feel about him being dead, but I am sure that the quality of their lives do not depend on his staying alive to suffer through decades of imprisonment. No amount of suffering on his part would have given back any of the years he took from them.

Many have observed that he couldn’t take what he’d dished out. He kept his victims captive for a decade, but he couldn’t even live through a couple weeks of captivity himself. Honestly, I think that’s beside the point. He didn’t kidnap those girls because he thought they wouldn’t mind being held prisoner in his house. He kidnapped them because he was a consummate abuser. No one likes being held captive, and if he was in solitary confinement, then his existence was especially horrible. That he ended his existence is not a surprise.

Out of all the ways his story could have ended, suicide is the one that makes sense. I don’t agree with capital punishment; the state should not give itself the right to kill prisoners. There is no universe in which it would have been appropriate to let him go free, ever. Nothing would have been gained by making him endure decades of confinement. His life no longer belonged to him, but it’s okay that he owned his death. It was probably the most sensible decision he ever made.

Capital Punishment Logic is So Weird.

Here we have news of the Ohio kidnapping case, in which Ariel Castro possibly faces the death penalty:

Prosecutors said Thursday they may seek the death penalty against Ariel Castro, the man accused of imprisoning three women at his home for a decade, as police charged that he impregnated one of his captives at least five times and made her miscarry by starving her and punching her in the belly.

The allegations were contained in a police report that also said another one of the women, Amanda Berry, was forced to give birth in a plastic kiddie pool.

Cuyahoga County prosecutor Timothy McGinty said his office will decide whether to bring aggravated murder charges punishable by death in connection with the pregnancies that were terminated by force.

“Capital punishment must be reserved for those crimes that are truly the worst examples of human conduct,” he said. “The reality is we still have brutal criminals in our midst who have no respect for the rule of law or human life.”

Castro, a 52-year-old former school bus driver, is being held on $8 million bail under a suicide watch in jail, where he is charged with rape and kidnapping.

Michelle Knight is the one who was subjected to abortions by starvation and battery. She was also put on midwife duty for Amanda Berry’s childbirth and—how’s this for mental abuse?–threatened with death if Amanda’s baby died. None of the captives ever saw a doctor or other qualified health professional. Fortunately, Knight knew her MMR and saved the baby.

I’m sure it would be even more interesting—and probably horrifying—to find out why Amanda was allowed to give birth while Michelle was not allowed to continue her pregnancies.

That’s a digression, though. Here’s what I want to point out: the prosecutor is talking about the death penalty, while the prisoner is on suicide watch.

I suggest a different strategy: just don’t bother with the suicide watch. Put him in a cell alone with some razorblades and rope, and let the chips fall where they may.

I don’t agree with the death penalty. The practical argument against capital punishment is that are some suspects who are wrongly convicted and executed. As long as there’s any possibility of wrongful conviction, the death penalty is an atrocity. That’s not an issue with Ariel Castro: we know what he did. But then we have the philosophical issue that the government is using its power to kill prisoners in order to show the populace that killing people is wrong. There’s something inherently fucked up about that. I don’t think the government should give itself permission to kill prisoners.

However, I also think the justice system is not obligated to protect prisoners from themselves. If Ariel Castro wants to die, he should have our permission. It’ll be the most sensible decision he’s ever made.